The early reception of Prey strongly indicates that the Predator franchise feels best in the forest or jungle. Hulu’s new take on Predator mythology, Prey is the fifth installment of the Predator series (not counting the Aliens vs Predator spin–offs), and the reaction to the film has been very positive. There was even a fairly widespread opinion that “Prey” was the best Predator film since Arnold Schwarzenegger, the predecessor of the Predator series in 1987.
Prey takes place in 1719 and focuses on a young Comanche woman named Naru (Amber Midtander) as the human protagonist. With a time frame of the 18th century and the central role of the Comanche, the setting of Prey places him in the forest forest as the epicenter of the hunt in the film. This setting has common features with other most popular parts of the Predator franchise.
RELATED TO: Prey: Predator Dreadlocks Are Much Bigger Than They Seem
The action of “Predator” took place in the jungles of Central America, where Arnold Schwarzenegger’s Dutchman led a team of cool commandos and created a terrifying threat (and laughter) A predator. Later in 2010’s Predators, his human characters were abducted and taken to a jungle on another planet used by Predators as a hunting preserve. With the reception that Prey has seen, along with Predator and Predators, which were its most famous predecessors in the Predator franchise, it indicates that the series thrives most in the jungle or in the forest.
Why the Predator Franchise Works Best in a Jungle Environment
A big part of the Predator franchise that works so well surrounded by trees, greenery, and wildlife probably lies in the Predators themselves as hunters. Humans have been hunting animals in such conditions since time immemorial, and the Predator films are changing humanity’s role in this equation when alien hunters arrive. A jungle or forest is an area in which humans can usually navigate relatively well, but the appearance of intimidating masked predators makes humans the very prey they pursue in such environments.
“Predator 2” is based on the concept of a “Predator” who transferred his hunting to urban conditions, while “Alien vs. Predator” transferred it to the frozen terrain of Antarctica, and “Alien vs. Predator: Requiem” and “Predator” transferred Predators to suburban territory. Although this is not a bad idea, and Predator 2 does its job best of all, the hunting aspect of Predator is not so important for the environment itself. This does not mean that there should never be any environmental experiments with the Predator franchise. However, the common trait of Predator, Predators and Prey is that the Predator is in a territory that makes the story look like a hunt from start to finish, and probably has a lot to do with their overall popularity.
Prey builds on the legend of the Predator, reinventing the franchise in some notable ways, including with the release of the film on Hulu with dubbing in the Comanche language. However, one of the fundamental aspects of the Predator franchise that it holds onto is that it is located in a territory that viewers subconsciously associate with hunting. Prey, having achieved the reception it has, offers plenty of evidence that hunting grounds are where the Predator franchise feels at home with its greatest track record of success.